Since Apple introduced iBooks Author and the concept of an iBook I have eagerly awaited their arrival on the desktop. The ability to access the same content as available on my iPad was great enough but the promise that all my highlights and notes would seamlessly sync between devices was the cherry on top.

Mavericks promised this integration and more. What was the more? Well the ability to preview a work in progress iBook without the need to tether an iPad to the development machine is fantastic!

What’s the Problem?

So why is iBooks on Mavericks a problem? It’s not the functionality per se contained within iBooks but rather the implementation of it and especially the transition from having books managed in iTunes to having them managed in a completely new application.

At best you will lose a potentially serious amount of disk space in the transition at worst you could lose your entire library … seriously.

File Location

My iTunes media folder is on an external drive. A practical decision given I have a 256GB SSD in my iMac. I also have a lot of books. I had wondered what would happen to the books contained within my previously well organized media folder within iTunes:

  • Would Mavericks leave the books in their current location?
  • Would it move them to a location of my choosing?
  • Would it unilaterally decide to move them to a location of Apple’s choosing? Surely not?

I had hoped Apple wouldn’t take the high-handed approach of the third option especially given that I’d feared that location would be my small system drive.

Well I was right to fear the worst as that’s exactly what Apple elected to do. Without an option to prevent it, opening iBooks and following the innocuous prompts to “update” to iBooks my books were unceremoniously deleted from the iTunes Media folder and moved to an obscure folder buried several levels down in a complicated structure within my Library folder, precisely:

~/Library/Containers/com.apple.BKAgentService/Data/Documents/iBooks

Organization? What’s That?

Moving the books isn’t the only huge change to eBook storage in transition from iTunes to iBooks. The books previously organized by author and book title in the file system are under the new system now a random collection of incomprehensible numeric names.

Before

Folder organization for books in iTunes

After

Folder organization for books in iBooks

ePubs Go Large!

What made the decision to force me to use my internal hard drive for book storage even worse is the fact that during the transition from iTunes to iBooks the ePub files are uncompressed into more incomprehensible numerically named folders the contents of which are thus exposed to the file system.

The main effect of this is increasing the amount of storage required for a book collection by, in my case, almost 50%.

Uncompressing the contents does expose them to the Spotlight search engine of your Mac meaning you have full text search but accessing the results of such a search opens the individual file containing the search term in the app associated with the relevant file type and not the eBook in it’s fully constituted format.

On a more positive note for general compatibility my testing revealed that dragging and dropping an .epub file out of iBooks does reconstitute it as a genuine file with an .epub extension and the file name is the title of the book.

Meta Data

iTunes supported the editing of meta data in books via the standard Info dialog box. This new iBooks app lacks any ability to edit metadata, so there’s no way to change images, genres, names, authors, publication dates or indeed anything else.

Synchronization

Despite the fact that eBooks are now viewed and managed via iBooks it is iTunes where the synchronization options reside, exactly the same as before iBooks arrived on the desktop.

While this has the benefit of a single point of control for iOS devices it does mean managing eBooks on Mavericks requires two apps instead of one.

Here’s to the Future Updates

As has happened before with Apple app updates the first iteration of a new app is often lacking what keen users consider to be essential features. The abject horror with which some professionals greeted Final Cut Pro X comes immediately to mind.

Doubtless future updates will address at least some of the issues outlined. Personally, the need for a user specified library location is my number one request.